The Answer, My Friend?


The issue of alternative energy sources churns much debate.  If you watch the new “Planet Green” cable channel or subscribe to mainstream environmental media, you might think that anyone concerned about the environment is surely of one accord on the best way to go to save our planet; and yet there is more variation in the thinking of thoughtful, committed people than you might think.

This post is designed to be the first of several on issues in alternative energy.  Please feel free to post constructive comments, as well as to contact Create WV if you represent an organization with a view point not expressed here.  Our interest is the pursuit of positive dialogue on the best choices for West Virginia’s future!

Windfarm_4

West Virginia in a “Post-Coal” Future

createwv.typepad.com

Residents of Clear Fork, Marsh Fork and other Raleigh County areas, with the support of environmental and community organizations such as Coal River Mountain Watch, the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Appalachian Voices (Boone, NC) and the Sierra Club, recently put forth a proposal calling for the development of an industrial-scale wind farm on Coal River Mountain.  Arguments are based on its long-term economic, social and environmental benefits, especially as they relate to the short-term benefits and long-term costs that will result from proposed strip-mining operations. 

Coal River Mountain lies in the heart of Coal River watershed, and is flanked on its two sides by Coal River Road and Clear Fork Road, with the Town of Whitesville located at the western edge of the mountain. In the latter months of 2006, David Orr — a professor at Oberlin College and a prominent environmental advocate and writer — worked with Appalachian voices to commission a study of the wind potential on Coal River Mountain. 

The study was conducted by WindLogics, a nationally recognized wind modeling and development firm, and it showed that the ridges along Coal River Mountain exhibited strong Class 4 to Class 7 average annual wind speeds.  [Note: Class 4 winds serve as a minimum threshold for industrial-scale wind development]

In terms of jobs and revenue, it was estimated that such a wind development would create over 200 local job opportunities during the 2-year construction period, as well as an estimated 40-50 permanent, direct jobs and an additional 20-30 indirect jobs for local residents related to the operation and maintenance of the turbines.  Further, based on reported estimates for other proposed wind farms in West Virginia, it is expected that a Coal River Mountain wind farm would generate over $20 million in direct local spending during the two-year construction phase and approximately $2 million annually during the operation phase, as well as contribute around $750,000 annually in property taxes for Raleigh County.  These economic benefits would accrue for the life of the wind farm, which, as long as the turbines are replaced every 20 years, can be forever, thus ensuring a sustainable source of jobs, income and tax revenue for decades into the future.

Rory Mcilmoil of Coal River Mountain Watch states, “It was found that Coal River Mountain has enough wind potential and land area to accommodate 220 two-megawatt wind turbines. Calculations showed that this was enough energy to power over 150,000 homes or over 90,000 total electricity customers, including residential, commercial and industrial units.”  Mcilmoil claims production estimates in strip mining permits show that mining operations will last for only 14 years.

“Once the coal is gone, there will be no more jobs available, the water will be contaminated, many of the residents will have moved out or been bought out, and the forest, another source of potential jobs and revenue, will be gone for decades to come, as will the possibility of producing clean wind energy on the scale that is currently available,” he said.

– Posted by Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher

What are your thoughts on our state’s “post-coal future”?  The strongest conversation will not just oppose someone else’s strategy, but will offer your own.  We hope to see your post soon!


5 responses to “The Answer, My Friend?”

  1. Sarah Barnes Avatar
    Sarah Barnes

    I personally love seeing those giant windmills on hilltops. I lived in Germany for a short time ten years ago and they were fairly common there. They are always really interesting to see from afar. Our state has got to stop placing so much emphasis on coal. It is not a future forward energy source and its extraction is just as detrimental to the environment as its emissions. I understand the vested interest our politicians have in remaining on the good side of the coal industry, but they need to play both sides of the fence. Coal jobs aren’t going to be around forever, but we can always be for coal AND alternative energy. Both mean jobs – only one is short term and the other for the future. Coal miners themselves even want a better future for their children – one that doesn’t involve them working in mines. And people shouldn’t have to have to work in mines simply because those are the only types of jobs in their area. The bottom line is that we as West Virginians shouldn’t be afraid of phasing out coal. We can do more. We can do better.

  2. Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher Avatar
    Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher

    June 23, 2008 Court backs PSC on Greenbrier wind project By Ken Ward Jr. Staff writer The state Supreme Court on Monday said that the Public Service Commission acted within its authority in approving a proposal to build 124 giant wind-power turbines along 23 miles of Greenbrier County ridges. The court issued a unanimous, unsigned decision that turned down challenges of the PSC decision filed by opponents of the Beech Ridge Energy LLC project. Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy argued that the PSC ignored its own permit regulations and did not obtain adequate information about the wind project’s potential impacts before approving it. The Monday ruling is the second major wind power decision by the Supreme Court in the last year. In June 2007, the court voted 4-1 to send back to circuit court a nuisance case seeking an injunction against NedPower Mount Storm LLC’s plans to erect 200 wind turbines along a 14-mile stretch of the Allegheny Front in Grant County. The Supreme Court decision is available online at http://www.state.wv.us/wvsca/docs/Spring08/33375.htm

  3. Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher Avatar
    Elizabeth Damewood Gaucher

    June 24, 2008 NASA scientist calls for phase-out of coal use by 2030 Climate approaching tipping point, he says Burning coal at power plants that don’t capture carbon dioxide emissions must stop by 2030 to minimize damage from climate change, one of the nation’s preeminent climate scientists said Monday. By Ken Ward Jr. Staff writer http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200806230648

  4. StopHateWV Avatar
    StopHateWV

    http://www.stophatewv.com Please help us promote this great community event by checking out our blog, posting a comment, and posting some information on your blog. Of course, we also invite you to join us on the evening of August 5, 2008 at the Charleston Marriott! Thanks, Stop Hate WV

  5. Jeff Avatar
    Jeff

    Here is an interesting site promoting “Clean Coal Technology.” With all the emotion on both sides, it’s tough to get a clear grasp on how viable clean coal is, what its long-term implications are, etc. This site is helpful in that it provides the industry’s best efforts to articulate their position: http://www.americaspower.org/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *